Stratigraphic and DNA evidences
The botanist Hans Helbaek wrote (in Braidwood 1960,
99) During the last few decades, close
teamwork between biologists and archeologists has made a fair start. Natural
scientists go to excavations and make their own professional assessments, or they do their own excavating and at the
same time become steeped in the scientific and technical background of
archeology. Biologists go to the field to study prehistoric deposits in situ and to
make ecological observations of present conditions. Only by such means will it be possible in the long run to build up the image
of the true
conditions of man's life in the remote past.
Technically, the study of ancient plants is performed by macroscopic
comparison as well as by microscopic analysis. The material of all the
categories is procured by archeology, and its dating-of paramount
significance-also depends upon archeology.
Any attempt to draw up a comprehensive history of
the cultivated plants should naturally begin with the transition between the food-collecting and
the food-producing stages of human economy.
Hitherto it has been difficult to get even tolerably near this critical point, and it must be realized that the
actual turning point of the transition will never be demonstrable in full, either
botanically or culturally. Paleolithic man did not suddenly resolve to give up his perambulations and
settle down to tilling the soil and tending crops, immediately beginning to
build the houses and make the specialized tools which permanent settlement implies. Probably some kind
of nursing and
protection of the wild food plants came first, without either actual
specialized implements or sedentary life, while only eventually did the advantage of tillage and of
permanent residence dawn upon the earliest farmers.
(Braidwood 1961, 2008) Many indications point toward the hill flanks of the Fertile
Crescent in southwestern Asia as the scene of the earliest development of
effective food production and a village-farming-community way of life, - some
10,000 years ago or less. In its 1959-60
field season, with a staff made up of both cultural and natural historians, the
Iranian Prehistoric Project reclaimed further evidence of this important
transitional step in human history. Over 250 prehistoric sites were thus
located, and their surface materials were tentatively classified into eight
rough chronological groups or models, which must represent - in a very general
way - a time span of culture history from about 100,000 years ago to about 5000
years ago. Sites yielding surface materials suggesting the time range from
about 15,000 to about 8000 years ago - the interval during which the swing to
effective food production and village-farming communities must have occurred
were well represented and several of these were selected for excavation in the
spring of 1960.
The rock shelter
called Warwasi, about 12 km northeast of Kermanshah, yielded a sequence of flint
industries from a phase of the Mousterian (The Middle Paleolithic or Old Stone
Age broadly spanned from 300,000 to 30,000 years ago.) through a sequence of
blade tools which included both Baradostian (at least begun from 36000 BC.) and
Zarzian levels (The period of the Zarzian (levels) culture is estimated about
18,000-8,000 years BC. It is succeeded Baradostian culture in the same region
and was related to Imereti culture in Caucasus). On the basis of the field
classification of these materials alone, there is reason to suspect little
typological disconformity in this developing sequence, which probably ends at
about 10,500 years ago.
The Zagros Paleolithic Museum is a museum in Kermášán (Kermanshah), established in 2008, contains rich collections of stone tools and animal fossil bones from various Paleolithic and Neolithic sites in Eastern Kurdsán (Iran), dating from ca. 1,000,000 years to some 8,000 years ago.
Warwasi, Tapaí Saráw Gá-mási-áw (Tapa Sarab), Ášáw, Ásíáw (Asiab) in Eastern Kurdsu and Jáŕmo, Karim Šahir, near Karkúk in Southern Kurdsu.
The IranianPrehistoric Project. During the 1959-60 field season the project's expedition excavated three sites, Warwasi, Sarab and Asiab near Kermanshah in search of evidence on the development of village farming communities by early man. The new sites are south and east of the previously excavated sites at Jarmo and Karim Shahir (top left) in Iraqi Kurdistan. [Based on a U.S. Air Force long-range navigation chart, 1:3,000,000]
Braidwood, R. J. and others, Iranian Prehistoric Project, Science, 133, 1961
Nevertheless, all indications
suggested that such traces of early village-farming communities as had been
found in western Asia were the earliest available anywhere in the world. We
were quite prepared to see independent beginnings in food-production, based on
other plants and sometimes animals, in other parts of the world (Braidwood,
1952a), but we reasoned that these were later experiments than the Near Eastern instance.
In
1951, Howe and Wright excavated Barda Balka (Wright and Howe, 1951). It is an open-air
site, with its stone tools contained in certain specific Pleistocene gravels on
a hilltop and in part consolidated within the breccia of a peculiar natural
columnar remnant (Pl. 9B) of this same gravel system which first drew attention
to the locality. The site is immediately south of the main Chemchemal-Sulimanlyah road, 2 miles northeast of Chemchemal, In the rolling country
which flanks a major tributary wadi of the Chemchemal branch of the headwaters
of the Tauq Chai.
For the
earlier food-gathering horizons, the stratigraphic evidence of Pleistocene
geology provides the basis for a local starting point. The artifacts of the
early food–gathering or middle Paleolithic site of Barda Balka are incorporated
in a river-gravel deposit marking the base of the youngest of three major
aggradation cycles observed locally in the Chernchemal valley. This position places
the site stratigraphically at a point much older than all other archeological remains
so far found in the same valley, since they can all be associated in one way or
another with the geological phases following the last major aggradation cycle.
Incidentally, these later remains are all obviously much later on typological
grounds also. However, to prove that the Barda Balka hand-ax, pebble-tool, and
flake industry preceded the Mousterian of the caves and open-air sites of Iraq
(read it Kurdsu), one must rely on stratigraphic sequences outside the
immediate area. These, on the basis of repeated and well known occurrences,
show generally Levalloisian-Mousterian flake industries stratigraphically
following core-biface or pebble-tool horizons either in caves elders, as in open-air river-valley sequences, as on the Indian
subcontinent, to take only the nearer examples. While stratigraphic evidence
cannot yet be shown in Iraq, the industries which on typological grounds could
make up such a sequence exist at Barda Balka in a geological sequence, at telegraph
pole 26/22 and Serandur, neither yet associated with any stratigraphic
sequence, and in the Mousterian deposits found in the lowest levels of several
caves. (Braidwood, R. J. and Howe, B., Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan, Chicago, 1960, P.3, 31, 147).
Plate 9B
This
peculiar natural columnar remnant is itself the Barda
Balka, which means “the outstretched stone”, bard means “stone” and bal
“outstretched form”. So it is not “at Barda Balka” as described below,
but the site’s name Barda Balka is dedicated to this
remarkable stone. See Bible Discovered pg. 248.
B. Natural “monolith”(probably a fossil-spring core) at Barda Balka. Gravel slope in background and to left of view yielded stone tools (Braidwood).
Plate 10
The Zarzi (A) and Pale Gawra (B) caves
Plate 27
Jarmo wheat. A. Imprint of ventral side of
Plate 28
Jarmo plant remains. A. Imprints of two-row barley florets, with kernel partly preserved in lower imprint. B. Carbonized kernels of two-row barley, with internode and one lateral flower partly preserved in top row.C. Carbonized seeds of field peas. D. Carbonized kernels of Pistachia mutica. Scale, about 4 diam.
These statements were made by the field excavators Braidwood, R. J. and others, in Prehistoric Investigations in Iraqi Kurdistan, Chicago, 1960 and Iranian Prehistoric Project, Science 133, 1961, I have quoted, as I have referred; except my explanations The Zagros Paleolithic Museum, Kermášán’s sites and Barda Balka.
However, who were the indigenous people created them? Can
one relate these findings to the Kurds? From 1998 constantly, I answered this
question with YES and I could provide still more evidences for my claim.
What are the linguistic and historical evidences? How does
DNA provide evidences for this claim?
Kurds are obviously descendants of
indigenous (first) Neolithic Northern Fertile Crescent aborigines https://hqberai.blogspot.com/search?q=DNA
Following this article on December 7, 2012, announcement:
Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu (Stratigraphic, Biological and DNA evidences).
The head of the Journal of Social, Political, and
Economic Studies, Professor Roger Pearson and John H. Brown – have been kindly
asked: What
is the DNA evidence? We will look forward to seeing the revised version.
On December 25, 2012, I provided
them a 30 pages revised version of “Kurds the earliest farmers and the
earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu”.
In reaction,
John H.
Brown wrote on December
27, 2012. We will submit it to our referees and advise you their decision
immediately we receive it.
But I have received no response, neither their advice!
Here our conversations:
From: iejournal@aol.com
[mailto:iejournal@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 9:37 PM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 9:37 PM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
Thank you for sending this. We will
submit it to our referees and advise you their decision immediately we receive
it. John H. Brown
On Dec 25, 2012, at 3:58 AM, Hamiit
Qliji Berai wrote:
As promised, I have the pleasure to
send you the document you asked for “The Earliest Farmers”It took me longer than expected. Please find the attachment.
Best wishes, Hamíit Qliji Bérai
From: iejournal@aol.com [mailto:iejournal@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:04 PM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:04 PM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
Will look forward to seeing the
revised version
On Dec 11, 2012, at 9:52 PM, Hamiit
Qliji Berai wrote:
Thank you, I will get back to you as
soon as possible,Hamiit
From: iejournal@aol.com [mailto:iejournal@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:13 AM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:13 AM
To: Hamiit Qliji Berai
Subject: Re: Kurds the earliest farmers and the earliest village-farming-community in Kurdsu
What is the DNA evidence?
On Dec 10, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Hamiit
Qliji Berai wrote:
Kurds the world’s
earliest farmers
The world’s earliest village-farming-community
in Kurdsu, stratigraphic
and DNA evidences.
No comments:
Post a Comment