Nov 6, 2020

Has the United Nations organization been fooled? Or they are fooling the international community?

Pseudo Cyrus Cylinder, Inscriptions of Nabonidus and the declaration of human rights


Ideology and lawgiving institutions existed probably in ca. 40 millennium BC in ancient Near East (Kurdish) 

This document is proof that the contemporary establishment of etymology and historical linguistics is a falsehood.


On artifacts of ca. 8 millennium BC occur widespread the cross-cardinal sign (dinker, dinger) "cardinal, lawgiver", cross-mission sign (mašu) and the cross-mass sign (maš) "act", which are matriarchal fertility symbols of cellular development and growth as well as symbols of natural social lawgiving continued in cuneiform inscriptions. In the interpretation of the contemporary establishment, it is accepted that culture does not arise at once, that culture goes back to about 40 millennium BC.  If so, then ideology and lawgiving institutions existed probably in ca. 40 millennium BC.

In the Law Codes of Ur-Nammu and Hammu-Rabi, well-known cuneiform inscriptions of about the third millennium BC occur texts: jí-asu-dán-di (Esses institute of the idea), or din-jí-dán-ki (vision academy "knowledge-place of vision").

 

Universities continue the falsehoods of Romans

Below, the ancient matriarchy motto bašar-yak-bí (one-human-being) is transformed to the one God by the Romans and to hocus-pocus by the universities.

This motto appears as a common thread throughout almost all ancient cuneiform texts of all periods.

asás-dá-yak bašar-yak šá-bí-ia (one-mother-essence one-human-being-authority).

bašar-yak-bí šu (matriarchy one-human-being authority).

gap-u ume bašar-yak-ga-ti (principles of universal human-unity).

ádi-ŕa ám-pá ume-maš-gur (ministry of human-based general principle act).

i-na ensu šát-ŕa ru (this is humans' happiness spirit).

This document is proof that the contemporary establishments of archaeology, anthropology, ethnography, history, linguistics, the Bible, and monotheism are based on hoaxes that have been imposed to deceive the world.  

The Cyrus Cylinder is a false presentation of the proper Cylinder of Abrahamic Council of Universal Matriarchy Mission that has been displayed at United Nations headquarters as the Cyrus Cylinder "Edict of Cyrus” (ca. 576 – 530 BC) the great Aryan king of Persia "modern Iran", king of the world, ... king of the four quarters' declaration concerning the preservation of human rights. The Cyrus Cylinder has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights. 

I have proved that the so-called Cyrus Cylinder and the Inscriptions of Nabonidus (cylinders, bricks, and other text fragments) have entirely nothing to do with Cyrus (Kuraaš), neither with his devil opponent Nabonidus. The texts that have been taken for the word Cyrus (kuraáš) and Nabonidus are corruptions. Nothing is true of the mentioned ridiculous claims about this cylinder (Edict of Cyrus) and his opponent Nabonidus at all.

According to the establishment: Replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" At the United Nations The Government of Iran presented the United Nations with a replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" in a ceremony held in the corridor outside the economic and Social Council Chamber on 14 October 1971. The "Edict of Cyrus” is a declaration made by Cyrus the Great concerning the preservation of human rights in occupied cities after his capture of Babylon in 539 B.C. Cyrus the Great (circa 600 B.C. to 529 B.C.) was the founder of the Persian Empire which, at his death, extended from the Hellespont to the Indies. The replica of the clay tablet on which the cuneiform letters of the “Edict” are inscribed was made by the British Museum from the original which is in its collection. The case in which it is displayed was designed by the Metropolitan Museum Art, New York, and contains English and French translations of the ancient Persian art as well as the replica itself. A view of the replica of the "Edict of Cyrus" on display at UN headquarters. 01 January 1977 United Nations, New York. Cyrus (Kuraáš (ca. 576 – 530 BC) the great Aryan king of Persia "modern Iran", king of the world, mighty king, king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four quarters, the son of Cambyses, great king, king of Anšan, grandson of Cyrus, the descendant of Teispes; the patron and deliverer of the Jews, the prophetic declarations of Cyrus the Great in the Bible, acting to restore the nation of Israel from Babylonian captivity. A declaration made by Cyrus the Great concerning the preservation of human rights in occupied cities after his capture of Babylon in 539 B.C. He freed the slaves, declared that all people had the right to choose their own religion, and established racial equality, that different races living in the city would be treated equally.  These and other decrees were recorded on a baked-clay cylinder in the Akkadian language with a cuneiform script. The Cyrus Cylinder has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights. It is translated into all six official languages of the United Nations and its provisions parallel the first four Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The devil opponent of Cyrus was Nabonidus the tyrannical king of Babylon.

That is the well-known story according to the establishment (recognized demonstrations by the world's leading universities and the Bible).

Nothing is true of the mentioned ridiculous claims about Cyrus and his opponent Nabonidus at all. The names Cyrus (Kuraaš) and Nabonidus do not occur in the so-called Cyrus Cylinder and the Inscriptions of Nabonidus.

The text that in Cyrus Cylinder has been taken for the word Cyrus (kuraáš), occurs frequently in Lines 12, 20, 21, 27, 35. From my examination has been clear that the name kuraáš (Cyrus) is a corruption of the word 1-durraš (oneness rolling of').

Compare Cyrus Cylinder L.12, Berai: 1-durraaš (oneness rolling of)

Cyrus Cylinder L.12, Berai: Jegu-1-durti (oneness authority position)

Cyrus Cylinder L.19 - L.20, Berai: šuána dur 1-durraaš (royalty role of oneness rolling)

Cyrus Cylinder L.21, Berai: dumu dumu 1-durraaš (all last oneness rolling of)

 Cyrus Cylinder L.27, Berai: 1-durraaš (oneness rolling of)

Cyrus Cylinder L.35, Berai: qetát 1-durraaš (oath covenant oneness rolling of).

Compare my decipherment with that of Schaudig 2001: Cyrus Cylinder and Ezida Cylinder of Nabonidus fragments below:

Cyrus Cylinder 1st and 2nd lines, Schaudig, L.1: [....] -nišu (.... when). L.2: [.... -ki] ibraatim (.... of the four quarters).

Cyrus Cylinder 1st and 2nd lines, Berai, L.1: [.... losed ...] wa nišu (... with symbol). L.2: [... losed...] uri ráati (... Abrahamic council) 

Cyrus Cylinder L.5, Schaudig: ... uriki ù siittaa-tim maḫaza (for Ur and the rest of the cultic centers)

Cyrus Cylinder L.5, Berai: ... násaruunuki ume-maš-gur še bašar-1 dáati bá zát zá (manifestation royal universal principle act one-humanity matriarchy be the essence of nature.

Last lines of Cyrus Cylinder L.44, 45

Cyrus Cylinder, Schaudig, L.44: [.....] -ti (...). L.45: [... ana d]ariati (.... for eternity).

Cyrus Cylinder, Berai, L.44: [... losed ....] 1-ti (... unity). L.45: [.... losed ....] 1-áĺáati (.... one-discipleship).

In the decipherment of Cyrus Cylinder, the name Nabonidus is falsely three times depicted, in lines 17, 25 and 33. Compare the depictions by Schaudig to my corrections:

Cyrus Cylinder L.17, Schaudig: Id ná.ni.tuku (Nabonidus).

Cyrus Cylinder L.17, Berai: 1-ága-pá šár-raddug (one knowledge-based council-justified-rate).

Cyrus Cylinder L.25, Schaudig: [ding]ir ma abšáani (who]m he (Nabonidus) imposed)

Cyrus Cylinder L.25, Berai: [... íĺ] be du šááni (... tribe be matriarchy kingship).

Cyrus Cylinder L.33, Schaudig: dingir amar.utu en (whom Nabonidus, to)

Cyrus Cylinder L.33, Berai: íĺ sar-áten (tribe's main oath).

Nabonidus Ezida Cylinder first and last lines:

Ezida-Cylinder Col.I.1, Schaudig 2001: [.....] -na'iid 1ugal tin.tirki 1ugal tin.tirki ([....] Nabuna'id, der König von Bäbil, "Nabonidus king of Babylon")

Ezida-Cylinder Col.I.1, Berai: [....-na] nun-cár (4) 80-ger gáĺĺu din 80-nerki ([... losed ...] 4-establishing 80-officials law call of 80 establishments).

Last line of Ezida-Cylinder Col.II.28, Schaudig: šuriib amaaat duumqíía (Erua gute Worte für mich ein!) "Erua good words for me"

Last line of Ezida-Cylinder Col.II.28, Berai: šuri mašnun ámaá dá-qet du-umkiyia (The joint decision establishing act of general mother-covenant universal matriarchy.

Almost international humanitarian "modern" legislation terms are known in the cuneiform texts of ca. 5000 years ago, regarding universal matriarchy rabbinic mission "one universal humanity", which have been falsified and disappeared now in nonsensicalness. by the men of God and their universities.

Invitation

In order to be able to continue this research, I need legal assistance, a research grant, and research hosting. This is an independent and unpaid multidisciplinary social sciences and humanities research, with no affiliation to any university that I do intensively since 1994. During this period, I have been forced to rely solely on my own finance with no outside support. 

In my endeavors, I am experiencing that in Western Europe the lawyers are not free to act against governments in matters like this as well as the academic experts are not free to express themselves and official journals are not free to publish this matter. 

I invite universities to stop committing "falsifying historical documents, adapting false educational sources, providing false information, fooling the international community, destruction of the archaeological records of human history and cultural heritage of the humankind, concealing of information on historical ethnic and linguistic development records and records of biological naturalism philosophy and to stop the spending of education budgets and grants on committing such crimes.” The establishments for the entire ancient world are hoaxes.

Join this global innovative and developmental thought and groundbreaking social sciences research that brings the proper knowledge, justice, and peace in the world, which offers the solution to the world’s seemingly unsolvable challenging problems. This research is an alternative perspective and I am open to collaborative research.

Continue reading next part 

No comments:

Post a Comment