What is the scientific value of holding a Ph.D. or a Prof. dr. in ancient studies in the present education system where people have been taught in a way that they completely misunderstand the ancient world and the humanities, and that has catastrophic consequences for men and society as a whole?
The
ancient study department of the universities of Germany, the United Kingdom,
France, and the United States of America are mainly responsible for adopting
false social sciences and humanities education sources to the world academic
circuits. From the 16th century, they are traditional managers of ancient
studies, which were adopted from the Roman Catholic Church.
As
the saying goes, dez bái, xiz bái, cur bái (being a criminal, being a cheater, being
brutal)
The
mentioned universities collectively continue fooling the world in all
brutality, although, it is 28 years now; I ask for attention to this situation
and still seeking to get research funding and a host institute for my unconventional, scientific excellence, unpaid research.
Below I publish a short piece of historical
document that was exhibited at the Ancient History Seminar, Institute
of Classical Studies, London, May 9th, 2013, (London - Paris – Berlin
– Chicago).
Seal impressions of Cyrus (Kuraš)
 |
| The Archaeology of Elam, Daniel Potts 1999 p.341 Figure 9.10 Composite drawing of the seal of Kurash (Garrison and Root 1996: Fig. 2a) “Kurash, the Anshanite, son of Shishpish [Teispes]”. |
Berai Note: Probably this seal impression is fake since the cuneiform inscription is not usual. Any way fake or not fake, the text on this seal has nothing to do with "Kurash, the Anshanite, son of Shishpish [Teispes]". Compare the decipherments:
 |
| © Hamiit Qliji Berai, November 12, 2020 |
Phonetic Value of the cuneiform signs according to the universities’ establishment
According to the establishment, the [DIŠ] would be missing at the beginning of the seal inscription. But that is not the case. DIŠ does not belong to the inscription. DIŠ is registered in the universities’ establishment for number 1, which has been frequently taken for Determinative before (usually male) personal names, transcription m, I or P. See below.
 |
| © Hamiit Qliji Berai, November 12, 2020 |
 |
| © Hamiit Qliji Berai, January 05, 2020 |
 |
Cyrus and Beyond, Contextualizing Persian
Identity, Ancient History Seminar, Institute of Classical Studies, London, May
9th, 2013, Wouter F.M.
Henkelman (Paris – Berlin – Chicago) Transliteration: Richard T. Hallock † & Wouter F.M. Henkelman. Translation: Wouter F.M. Henkelman / 2012 |
See the next part ....
Answer to a logical question
ReplyDeleteAre all those ancient Near Eastern scientists wrong, and you are the only one in this world who is right?
Yes, that is absolutely true, though it sounds illogical.
Illogical, because the question asked is too simplistic for this complicated subject.
The great experts in this field, among others Robert William Rogers, George Glenn Cameron, James Mellaart, John Anthony Brinkman, Walther Hinz, Rykle Borger, Marie-Joseph Steve, and the present Richard Dumbrill, Matthew Stolper, Hartmut Kühne, Hanspeter Schaudig, Andrew George, Daniel Potts, among others, have not said the last word on the matter. There is no properly adopted information available about ancient texts to the experts.
The proper specialists should know that, because of the establishment's inconsistency, contradictions and absurd interpretations.
All those scientists for the interpretation of archaeological materials and decipherment of cuneiform and the ancient biblical texts, they follow the one same establishment sample and accepted etymology that they have traditionally been taught. Their established system is false.