The Old Persian Inscriptions and Monuments are Falsehoods. Modern Scholars Trying to Appease it

 

Bísetūn (Behistun) Monument in Kermášán (Eastern Kurdsán)

The Persian and Babylonian versions of the trilingual texts are at the modern time added to the monuments. The genuine supposed Elamite version has been manipulated. The Bísetūn monument has nothing to do with the Persian. The word Persian is not original but recently has been set in the inscription. That is also clear from the uncommon construction of the Persian version that I wrote in Bérai 2002. The authentication of the trilingual inscription is never attested seriously, although there has been the continuous noticed tendency of radically different historical settings, contradicts, and indications of falsehood. However, modern scholars trying to appease the issue. They do feel uneasy to call into question the ethnic and linguistic identity of the early Persians!

From the 15 – 17th centuries, the Roman Christian missionaries and Portuguese colonial agents invented sources for the Greco-Roman and the biblical Persian in present Iran by replacing the ruins of an ancient royal burial monument that was known as “Cel Menára” (The Forty Minarets) and the ruins of the biblical Solomon and Somson (Kurdish Selímán and Šám-šon) monuments. They renamed the ruins Persepolis and Pasargadae. This is the reason that for the pseudo-Achaemenid Empire (539-331 BC) there is no archaeological evidence outside the impressive monumental complexes of Persepolis and Pasargadae. Although the establishment shamelessly claims “This is particularly surprising given the historic and epigraphic evidence for the existence of a very tight-knit, efficiently organized administration. Wherever major Achaemenian sites outside Iran had been investigated, it appeared that religious practices, local power structures, and pre-existing customs were respected and adapted in a deliberate attempt at cooperative rule.” 

In the 17th century, the Portuguese were driven from the present Persian Gulf, and their trade was transferred to the English and Dutch. From then (1600) the Dutch and British East India Companies continued the task of inventing false evidence for Persian existence. In the 18th century, the ruins of Persepolis were advanced to colossal Persian palaces with trilingual inscriptions. 

In the 19th century, the agents of the East India Company pictured and carved the false evidence for Persian at the rock of Bísetūn. From then they revealed the present false structure for the study of the ancient Near East civilization. 

The falsehood is continuing in accordance with early stories regards Persians and the Jews adopted in the Bible. Cyrus Cylinder line 12: God searched everywhere and then he took a righteous king, his favorite, by the hand, he called out his name: Cyrus, king of Anšan; he pronounced his name to be king all over the world. (The Context of Scripture. Vol. II: Monumental Inscriptions from the Biblical World, 2003, Leiden and Boston Brill Academic Publishers).

Continue reading